residents and neighbours who gave letters or talks at the November 19, 2009 Council meeting in support of chickens:
|
Letter from Ron Allensen, President of the Otter Valley naturalists: Several people have requested I address council in regard to the issue of keeping chickens in I have taken the liberty of composing a very simple bylaw that just regulates the keeping of Sincerely, Ron Allensen |
|
Letter of Support From Marion Rogers, Resident of Port Burwell FW: Chickens in Bayham Dear Mr. Kruger:
|
|
Presentation to Bayham Council November 19,2009 There are many reasons to defeat the motion to implement an animal control bylaw in Bayham, but I want to focus on just one of them: to ban backyard chickens is to diminish food security. By banning backyard chickens, Bayham would be closing the door to an excellent source of dietary protein. Fresh fruits and vegetables can be grown even in small backyards. When it comes to supplying your own source of protein however, it's impossible to get Rover to lay breakfast each morning or fit Bessie the cow in your backyard. Chickens are small, easy to care for, and won't take up the entire yard. A couple of chickens can provide daily eggs for families who may never even dream of a roast beef dinner-- people who'll never know they're part of the Local Food Movement. A trip to the backyard coop requires only a few minutes, no vehicle, and no gas. Even mothers in large households can Related to food security is the added benefit for vegetable gardens. Chickens can help reduce the reliance on purchased compost or fertilizer for home-grown vegetables. Our two hens, Fluffy and Crown Royal, are great little garden helpers-- their manure-laden bedding provides excellent feedstock for my compost tumblers. As well, the Ladies love to help me dig a garden bed- they turn garden-destroying grubs into yummy eggs with amazing efficiency.
Bayham has problems, to be sure, but Fluft and Crown Royal aren't among them. The current laws do not prohibit chickens as pets (and they're far more interesting than budgies or pigeons!) or hobbies (what a great way to teach kids about responsibility and where food comes from) so where are the hordes of would-be chicken keepers? It's obvious that the current "green light for chickens" is adequate. If it doesn't cover all the possible misuses and abuses, well, no law can do that. A ban would just drive the backyard chickens, figuratively speaking, underground. Don't turn FluS and Crownie into Bayham has problems, to be sure, but Fluffy and Crown Royal aren't among them. The current laws do not prohibit chickens as pets (and they're far more interesting than budgies or pigeons!) or hobbies (what a great way to teach kids about responsibility and where food comes from) so where are the hordes of would-be chicken keepers? It's obvious that the current "green light for chickens" is adequate. If it doesn't cover all the possible misuses and abuses, well, no law can do that. A ban would just drive the backyard chickens, figuratively speaking, underground. Don't turn Fluffy and Crownie into outlaws! The commercial egg industry is not under seige here. Most people will still drive to the mall to buy insipid eggs from miserable, antibiotic-stuffed, genetically uniform, battery hens that are deprived of all natural behaviours. But for people who want local food that's undeniably healthy and not dependent on a global system of energy-intensive animal factories, backyard chickens are part of the The commercial egg industry is not under seige here. Most people will still drive to the mall to buy insipid eggs from miserable, antibiotic-stuffed, genetically uniform, battery hens that are deprived of all natural behaviours. But for people who want local food that's undeniably healthy and not dependent on a global system of energy-intensive animal factories, backyard chickens are part of the |